Using Bayesian BWM to Analyze Elevator Performance Requirements for Collaborative Product Innovation Design

Authors

  • Huai-Wei Lo Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8281-8740
  • Wen-Yu Chen Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin, Taiwan
  • Sheng-Wei Lin Department of Financial Management, Nation Defense University, Taipei, Taiwan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-4580

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v2i.11503

Keywords:

Product Innovation, Safety and Reliability Prioritization , Bayesian BWM, Multiple Criteria Decision-Making

Abstract

This study addresses the critical need to evaluate elevator performance requirements within collaborative product innovation systematically. Leveraging insights from sales, design, and maintenance experts, the research identifies and prioritizes critical performance dimensions, including safety, design, service, and technological innovation. By employing the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (Bayesian BWM), the study overcomes the limitations of traditional decision-making approaches, offering robust and consistent results through probabilistic analysis. The findings highlight "mechanical and structural safety" as the paramount criterion, emphasizing its pivotal role in ensuring elevator reliability. Key factors, such as operational efficiency, economic performance, and maintenance, further inform actionable strategies to optimize elevator design and manufacturing processes. This research contributes a structured framework for performance evaluation and fosters collaboration among industry stakeholders, enhancing innovation and sustainability in the elevator industry.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-13

How to Cite

Lo, H.-W., Chen, W.-Y., & Lin, S.-W. (2025). Using Bayesian BWM to Analyze Elevator Performance Requirements for Collaborative Product Innovation Design. Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science, 2, 218–232. https://doi.org/10.59543/jidmis.v2i.11503

Issue

Section

Articles